Muslims with Meat Cleavers and Knives -- don't complain about the way your enemy fights.
On May 23, 3:31 pm, Travis <[email protected]> wrote: > ‘Muslims with Meat Cleavers and Knives and Me without a Gun’**** > > Posted 5 hours > ago<http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/05/muslims-with-meat-cleavers-and-kn...>by > Gary > DeMar <http://politicaloutcast.com/author/gary/> filed under > Crime<http://politicaloutcast.com/category/crime-2/>, > Culture <http://politicaloutcast.com/category/culture-2/>, > Immigration<http://politicaloutcast.com/category/immigration/>, > Islam <http://politicaloutcast.com/category/islam/>, > Law<http://politicaloutcast.com/category/law/>, > Liberalism <http://politicaloutcast.com/category/liberalism-2/>, > Politics<http://politicaloutcast.com/category/politics/>, > Second Amendment <http://politicaloutcast.com/category/second-amendment-2/>, > Terrorism <http://politicaloutcast.com/category/terrorism/>**** > > If there was ever a reason to stop gun control, we now have a perfect > example. In broad daylight, a self-identified Muslim shouting ‘Allah Akbar’ > and an accomplice repeatedly stabbed and tried to behead an off-duty > soldier in front of dozens of passers-by. What could they do? They were > unarmed. Someone with a gun could have shot the men at a safe distance.**** > > The gun v. sword scene in *Raiders of the Lost Ark* comes to mind.**** > > Weapons are not the problem. If people want to murder, they’ll find a way. > If a gun isn’t available, a couple of meat cleavers and knives will do the > job.**** > > I was talking with my company’s cinematographer about sweeping landscape > shots, and I mentioned the masterfully shot film *Shane* (1953) that stars > Alan Ladd (Shane), Van Heflin (Joe Starret), Jean Arthur (Marian Starrett), > and Jack Palance (Wilson).**** > > There’s a scene in *Shane* where Shane and Marian have a short discussion > about guns:**** > > *Marian:* “Guns aren’t going to be my boy’s life.”**** > > *Shane:* “A gun is a tool, Marian, no better or worse than any other tool. > . . . An axe, a shovel, or anything. A gun is as good or bad as the man > using it.”**** > > The exchange begins at the 1:37 mark. Watch the entire 2-minute clip. And > if you haven’t seen the film, you need to in the widescreen version.**** > > As we learn, a gun was necessary for defense against a hired gunman > (Palance), otherwise the settlers would have been driven off their land.**** > > Great Britain has strict gun control laws. Advocates of gun control believe > that these laws cut down on violence and crime. Such laws only empower > lawbreakers.**** > > The 2011 riots in London indicate that lawless people will use any means at > their disposal to force their wills on others. Three men were killed by an > automobile, people were openly beaten in the streets, and business > establishments were looted while others were burned. Store owners had no > way of protecting their property. The people doing the looting knew that > they would meet little resistance. “In reality, the English approach has > not reduced violent crime. Instead it has left law-abiding citizens at the > mercy of criminals who are confident that their victims have neither the > means nor the legal right to resist them. Imitating this model would be a > public safety disaster for the United States.”**** > > So what does the law abiding citizen do? He shops on Amazon.com for > baseball bats! He can’t buy guns, so he gets the next best thing, a metal > version of the Louisville Slugger. In a 24-hour period, sales for baseball > bats on Amazon UK rose by more than 6000 percent.**** > > Defenseless citizens were also buying police-style telescoping truncheons. > (The spring-loaded ones are illegal.) *The > Guardian*<http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/aug/11/uk-riots-amazon-withdraws-tr...>reported > the following: “Amazon has removed several police-style telescopic > truncheons from sale on its site as soaring sales of truncheons, baseball > bats and other items that could be used as weapons sparked fears of > vigilantism in the wake of widespread rioting.”**** > > So now, law-abiding citizens are even more defenseless. They can’t even > order a baseball bat on line to protect themselves from roaming thugs. > Maybe it’s time they whittle down their cricket bats. Paul Joseph > Watson<http://www.infowars.com/amazon-disarms-brits-by-banning-self-defense-...>writes: > “Just like gun control, banning baseball bats only disarms the > public and creates victims. Criminals will always be able to acquire > weapons of any description because they do not obey laws. Leaving Brits > defenseless will only embolden the rioting hordes.”**** > > Read > more:http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/05/muslims-with-meat-cleavers-and-kn... > **** -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
