Barack Obama’s 
Lawlessness<http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/07/12/barack-obamas-lawlessness/>
****

Peter Wehner <http://www.commentarymagazine.com/author/peter-wehner/> |
@Peter_Wehner <http://twitter.com/Peter_Wehner>[image:
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/wp-content/themes/commentary/img/twitter_handle.png]07.12.2013
- 2:30 PM
****

** **

http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/07/12/barack-obamas-lawlessness/****

** **

Both Charles 
Krauthammer<http://townhall.com/tipsheet/greghengler/2013/07/10/krauthammer-obamas-1st-goal-is-to-hook-americans-on-healthcare-heroin-n1638234>and
Ramesh
Ponnuru<http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-27/obama-s-dangerous-contempt-for-the-rule-of-law.html>have
spoken about the lawlessness of the Obama administration. Examples
include (but are not limited to) unilaterally delaying implementation of
the Affordable Care Act’s employer mandate, issuing health-care edicts that
undermine the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, making unconstitutional
“recess appointments” to the National Labor Relations Board and the
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, refusing to enforce current
immigration laws related to illegal immigrants who were brought to America
as children, and waving welfare work requirements.****

This is all part of a pattern in which Mr. Obama enforces laws he likes and
refuses to enforce (or unilaterally alters) laws he disagrees with. I
suppose the temptation to act as a potentate is understandable; but it also
happens to be illegal. The president, after all, has the constitutional
duty to “take care that the Laws be faithfully executed” (see Article II,
Section 3 for more).****

One of the reasons there isn’t a firestorm of protest against the
president’s contempt for the rule of law is that that apart from a few
honorable exceptions, the press doesn’t care and therefore isn’t covering
this story. Let’s just say that if the same kind of violations had been
committed by presidents with the last names of oh, say, Bush or Reagan, you
can be sure the *New York Times*, the *New York Review of Books*, Politico,
CNN’s Anderson Cooper, NPR, and the major news networks would all be
covering the story.****

The problem here is that a dangerous precedent is being set by the
president. To understand why, consider the
words<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUqytjlHNIM>of Thomas More to
Roper in Robert Bolt’s
*A Man for All 
Seasons*:<http://www.amazon.com/Man-All-Seasons-Play-Acts/dp/0679728228/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1373650945&sr=8-2&keywords=a+man+for+all+seasons>
****

And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you—where
would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country is planted
thick with laws from coast to coast—man’s laws, not God’s—and if you cut
them down—and you’re just the man to do it—do you really think you could
stand upright in the winds that would blow then? ****

Barack Obama is doing his part to cut down from coast to coast the laws he
doesn’t much care for. He does so because he’s a progressive who believes
the ends (advancing a liberal agenda) justifies the means (lawlessness).
But unfortunately in the future the winds will come–and when they do, and
when Americans cannot stand upright in them, it may dawn on some folks that
our contempt for the rule of law was nurtured and flowered during the Obama
era.****

** **


__._,_.___






__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


<<image001.png>>

Reply via email to