the left has waited for a scenario like this. if only George Zimmerman had
cooperated by being by being a full blown cracker instead of half baked.


On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Travis <[email protected]> wrote:

> I found the infomercial of the fat broads in pink tutus dancing in a
> circle singing about the virtues of a vacuum cleaner far more interesting
> than this entire mess.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Thanks for sharing this article Michael.   As Shafer openly admits, he
>> didn't watch the whole trial,  (I caught most of it)  and I think his
>> premise is just a little skewed,  but he brings up an excellent point; a
>> point that is, (as Plain Ol's calls it)  "Spot On".
>>
>> In my humble opinion,  our Nations' States, Counties and municipalities
>> all made a grave, serious mistake, like here in Florida,  when in 1985 we
>> removed the "law"  that required and mandated it a citizen's duty to use
>> whatever force necessary to resist an illegal or wrongful arrest.
>>
>> This was replaced with statutes that mandated it was illegal to resist a
>> law enforcement officer.....In Florida,  the minor infraction is titled:
>> "resisting an officer without violence"  and the felonious charge  is
>> captioned: "resisting an officer with violence".   Both of these statutes,
>> but especially the "without violence"  charge are "catch-all"  criminal
>> infractions and hard to prove against.  They should be repealed in every
>> jurisdiction, and the old laws that required a citizen to resist illegal
>> arrests be reinorporated.
>>
>> I believe that this is just one more check to balance out overly
>> aggressive and errant law enforcement officers.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:23 PM, MJ <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> *What Bothered Me Most About the Zimmerman Trial
>>> *Butler Shaffer
>>> July 14, 2013
>>>
>>> I did not watch the entirety of this trial, but I did watch most of the
>>> closing arguments.  There was a tone to the prosecution’s summation to the
>>> jury that left me with the impression that the core of George Zimmerman’s
>>> offense was that he was *not* a police officer. While giving
>>> lip-service to the propriety -- even the desirability -- of “neighborhood
>>> watch” practices, the state’s prosecutors saw a conflict between ordinary
>>> people and “official” police officers doing what Zimmerman did.  Toward the
>>> end of the state’s summation, it was said that if a person wanted to do
>>> what George Zimmerman did “you’d better have one of these” (whereupon a
>>> photo of a policeman’s badge was projected onto the screen).
>>>
>>> What the state was implicitly acknowledging -- whether such was its
>>> intent or not -- was the real-world dual standard that operates on the
>>> streets of virtually every city in every state: a police officer will
>>> almost never be held to account, criminally, for wrongs committed against
>>> innocent victims. Take the identical facts in the Zimmerman case and change
>>> just one: have George Zimmerman be a city-appointed police officer. Is
>>> there anyone so naïve as to believe that his actions would have turned him
>>> into a criminal defendant?  Would the event have even made it into the
>>> media -- apart, perhaps, from a blurb news report on page 23 of the local
>>> newspaper? Because the state is defined as a system enjoying a monopoly on
>>> the use of violence, its practitioners must be shielded from the
>>> consequences of their violent acts.
>>>
>>> I shall not hold my breath awaiting the media babblers addressing this
>>> issue. The institutionalized keepers-of-the-questions-to-be-asked would
>>> never be so foolish or careless as to allow such a thought to surface.
>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>
>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> --
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>
>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "PoliticalForum" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>>
>
>  --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to