September 3, 2013 ****
Foreign policy pros aghast at Obama's 'rookie mistake' on Syria****

Thomas Lifson****

** **

As Congress prepares to debate President Obama's proposed strike on Syria,
normally taciturn foreign policy experts, including some former members of
his diplomatic team, are letting the Solons know that we do not have a
steady hand at the helm. Writing at left wing website
Buzzfeed<http://www.buzzfeed.com/miriamelder/foreign-policy-hands-wonder-whats-the-point-of-obamas-syria>,
Miriram Elder cites one such critic: ****

Frederic Hof spent President Obama's first term as the State Department's
point man on Syria. He is now a furious administration critic, and a symbol
of the growing consensus in the professional foreign policy community that
the Obama Administration - no matter how its last-minute detour through
Congress turns out - has badly bungled its Syria policy through two years
of popular uprising turned bloody civil war.****

"The events of the past ten days suggest that there was no administration
forethought to the possibility of a major chemical incident in Syria,"
wrote Hof, currently a fellow at the Atlantic Council, where his former
boss is Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel. Hof had floated the specter of a
chemical attack by the regime months ago.****

"The results of this mystifying lack of preparedness have been abysmal," he
wrote, calling Obama's decision to seek congressional approval for the
strikes "constitutionally sound, but strategically appalling" and
suggesting the White House find "an objectives-based strategy."****

Hof struck at what, for those who spend their time thinking about grand
strategy and not domestic politics, is the heart of the matter. The
administration has consistently separated the goals it hopes to achieve
with a military strike - punish Assad, send a warning to similar states,
restore U.S. credibility - from the objectives it hopes to achieve
politically: to reach a negotiated peace in Syria with Assad no longer at
the country's helm. In terms of strategic planning, the separation of the
two is almost a rookie error.****

It is quite extraordinary for such an important foreign policy honcho to
publicly speak so candidly about his former boss, especially when that boss
is still in office.****

The Associated 
Press's<http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/major-test-obama-overrules-team-20136813?singlePage=true>White
House correspondent Julie Pace explains that extent to which Obama is
operating as almost a lone wolf, ignoring or overruling his experts in the
State Department and elsewhere, and holing up with close political advisors
to make (and change) political decisions:****

As Obama grappled with putting military action to a vote in Congress, he
didn't consult his foreign policy team. Instead, he sought out Denis
McDonough, a longtime adviser who now serves as his chief of staff. And
most of the administration's foreign policy leadership was absent from the
Oval Office meeting Friday night when the president informed several
advisers about his decision to seek congressional approval.****

Rice, a member of the White House staff, was in the room. But Kerry and
Hagel were only informed about the decision later that night during phone
calls from the president.****

"All power flows from and into the White House," said Aaron David Miller, a
former adviser to Democratic and Republican administrations and current
vice president at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
"He's relied, not surprisingly, on a very close circle of trusted advisers.
He really is a controlling foreign policy president."****

So, we have a "controlling foreign policy president" who thinks he knows
more than his experts, who casually drew a red line and made a "rookie
mistake" on strategy. Now he is left with the task of diverting blame for
the downstream consequences of his threatened attack on Syria to Congress.**
**

The mainstream media will never inform the general public of the depth of
incompetence of the president. But overseas media who are not necessarily
committed to maintaining the public image of the First Black President are
not so shy. There is every possibility that Obama could trigger a disaster
with his planned strike. Syria, Iran, and others get a vote in determining
what happens next.****

God save the United States.****


*Page Printed from:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/09/foreign_policy_pros_aghast_at_obamas_rookie_mistake_on_syria.html
* at September 03, 2013 - 09:42:04 AM CDT****


__._,_.___






__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to