Hi, At the risk of starting a meta-discussion, I would like to know how diverse the monitoring is network-wise and whether monitoring is performed from redundant locations to reduce error of one?
What brings this up is that often times due to (what we determine is) routing issues between our server and the pool's monitoring system(s) seem to cause damage to our score when our services are fully available during the claimed outage. Perhaps seeing the IP(s) used for monitoring will allow server operators to at least see what network(s) can effect our monitoring score and ourselves monitor the transit availability. On 14/09/2011 10:38, Ask Bjørn Hansen <[email protected]> wrote: > If you ban the monitoring IPs your banning logic is being way too > aggressive. > > > Sorry for my English. I want to ban flooders, but i don't want to ban the > > monitor servers > > _______________________________________________ > pool mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool -- Kradorex Xeron <[email protected]> Founder, Chief Administrative Officer IP Network Specialist, Systems and Networks Administrator Digibase Operations, Research and Development <http://digibase.ca/>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ pool mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool
