On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 08:26:00PM -0700, Ask Bj?rn Hansen wrote: > > On Oct 8, 2011, at 16:01, Tom Hek wrote: > > > I think the peering between my ISP, Leaseweb, and the monitoring system is > > really bad, because I get every one or two times a month a mail my NTP > > service is unreachable while it's perfectly available. Anyone else having > > this problem? This is my system: > > http://www.pool.ntp.org/scores/2001:1af8:4400:a00e:1::1 The graphs look > > horrible, but from my own probes to this system from another v6 host on > > another network everything looks fine, even when I'm "unreachable" > > according to the pool monitoring service. > > > > Can something be done about this? > > Yes, but we can't do anything on this list. You need to tell your provider > to check their IPv6 announcements / connections / providers / peers. It > looks like they only have local routes in Europe and a bit of peering. > > Their looking glass / route server - http://noc.leaseweb.com/lg/ - doesn't > seem to support IPv6 BGP lookups, but when I traceroute to servers in > California on various networks it goes nowhere (www.v6.facebook.com, a > California akamai v6 IP - 2600:1406::5043:4a90 - www.pool.ntp.org, etc).
Never seen any improvements on their ipv6 from the outside. Their replies on ipv6 questions suggest that they are not willing to broaden their peering outside of the AMS-IX and the one or two exceptions. Assume that Leaseweb will maintain their broken-ipv6 status for a while longer. (En doe jezelf een plezier.. laat Leaseweb es liggen, en kijk eens serieus naar andere partijen die wel hun zaken op dat vlak iets beter op orde hebben.) -- TC, ,Mark _______________________________________________ pool mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool
