On Jun 11, 2012, at 14:47, Chuck Swiger wrote:

> You make a decent point, although my takeaway is that one probably should use 
> NTP instead of SNTP whenever possible.  For embedded devices like WiFi 
> routers and the like using SNTP which can't easily be changed to run ntpd, 
> they might well be happier pointing to a local NTP server on the same subnet, 
> instead of remote timeservers...

>From talking to some of the people making boxes using SNTP, there are plenty 
>applications where running ntpd or similar isn't practical or possible.

My main point though was: Run SNTP at a particular interval if you want, but 
not at a particular (non-randomized) schedule.


Ask
_______________________________________________
pool mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool

Reply via email to