Hello Ask
On 17.06.2012 17:32, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Jun 17, 2012, at 0:12, Kiss Gábor wrote:
1. Please compare IPv4 and IPv6 grapsh.
Can you see the different characteristics?
Yes, I think it's a good example of how IPv4 routing and
connectivity is just better (still). Also, I think there are
some local IPv6 problems by the monitoring server I am trying
to figure out with the help of the bandwidth provider.
It probably depends where your IPv6 connectivity is going
through, for example any kind of tunnel or native from your
access provider.
See my graphs at [1], there is not much a difference between IPv4
and IPv6 (native through my SDSL ISP).
[1] http://www.pool.ntp.org/user/home4u.ch
The servers ntp1.home4u.ch (2001:8a8:1005:1::11, 62.12.173.11)
and ntp2.home4u.ch (2001:8a8:1005:1::12, 62.12.173.12) are
directly connected through the SDSL line. The server
ntp3.home4u.ch (2001:8a8:1005:2::186, 62.2.85.186) has IPv6
routed through a local server and then over the SDSL line, but
IPv4 is directly connected through the cable TV line. My cable
ISP does not yet support native IPv6. On ntp3.home4u.ch I had
recently removed the drift file and also reset and re-adjusted
the fudge value for the DCF77 clock, so it is not yet running as
smoothly as I would like to have it.
bye
Fabian
_______________________________________________
pool mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool
