On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote: > > Yes, I think it's a good example of how IPv4 routing and > connectivity is just better (still). Also, I think there are some > local IPv6 problems by the monitoring server I am trying to > figure out with the help of the bandwidth provider.
http://www.pool.ntp.org/user/davehart provides a contrarian view. The timescales are different but the two addresses represent the same host, located at ISC. Note the system is not mine in any sense -- I simply added it to the pool. It is maintained by ntp.org staff, particularly Steve Kostecke and Harlan Stenn. As viewed by the pool monitoring, the offset error band over IPv6 is about 2 msec, vs. as much as 15 msec for IPv4. The hostname is pool-test.ntp.org. As with all pool servers, please do not cherry-pick it for time service by name, or worse, addresses, or suffer the consequences when the service is changed or withdrawn. Cheers, Dave Hart _______________________________________________ pool mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool
