They are still human beings and must be treated as such, but they must be judged by a different court other than the United States.
On Feb 24, 1:34 pm, Joel Brauer <[email protected]> wrote: > This country was founded upon the following principle that, "We hold these > truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are > endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these > are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, > governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the > consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes > destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to > abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such > principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem > most likely to effect their safety and happiness." (Declaration of > Independence<http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/freedom/doi/text.html>, > 1776) > > Please, would someone who supports the idea, that because a person is not an > American citizen this means they are not privy to due process, explain how > this makes any sense in light of what this country was founded on!? > > Joel Brauer > > Only you can decide to be happy! The rest of life is in the details... > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Lance McCulley > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > I agree, Joel. Due process is an inalienable right, according to our Bill > > of Rights. Am I right? > > > -Lance > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Joel Brauer <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> If this is war they should be handled according to the Geneva > >> Conventions. If it's not war, then they should be handled the way any > >> non-us citizen is handled when captured by our authorities. WITH DUE > >> PROCESS! > > >> Joel Brauer > > >> Only you can decide to be happy! The rest of life is in the details... > > >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Lance McCulley > >> <[email protected]>wrote: > > >>> What court system should be used, if any? > > >>> -Lance > > >>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Jarrad Reiner <[email protected]>wrote: > > >>>> Couldn't agree more... > > >>>> Jarrad > > >>>> On Feb 24, 2009, at 3:12 PM, clowkun wrote: > > >>>> > I'm sorry but if they're not American citizens they don't have the > >>>> > right to use our court system to challenge their detention. I don't > >>>> > want them to be put in unsanitary and humiliating conditions such as > >>>> > Guantanamo Bay but they can not use our court system to challenge > >>>> > their detention. > > >>>> > On Feb 24, 7:20 am, Jarrad Reiner <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> >>http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ > >>>> >> ALeqM5inrssFARYO4US7mMu27... > > >>>> >> Jarrad --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Politically Opinionated Outspoken People Expounding Religion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pooper?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
