I do agree with you that they have the right to confront their accusers. Just like my first comment on this post, I just don't agree they should use our judicial system and be treated as American citizens.
On Feb 24, 2:39 pm, Joel Brauer <[email protected]> wrote: > The question is not how they are judged or where. It is about whether or > not a person has the right to confront his accusers. and other rights that > we believe are basic human rights when it comes to the judicial system. > > Joel Brauer > > Only you can decide to be happy! The rest of life is in the details... > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:36 PM, clowkun <[email protected]> wrote: > > > They are still human beings and must be treated as such, but they must > > be judged by a different court other than the United States. > > > On Feb 24, 1:34 pm, Joel Brauer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This country was founded upon the following principle that, "We hold > > these > > > truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are > > > endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among > > these > > > are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these > > rights, > > > governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the > > > consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes > > > destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to > > > abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on > > such > > > principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem > > > most likely to effect their safety and happiness." (Declaration of > > > Independence< > >http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/freedom/doi/text.html>, > > > 1776) > > > > Please, would someone who supports the idea, that because a person is not > > an > > > American citizen this means they are not privy to due process, explain > > how > > > this makes any sense in light of what this country was founded on!? > > > > Joel Brauer > > > > Only you can decide to be happy! The rest of life is in the details... > > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Lance McCulley <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > I agree, Joel. Due process is an inalienable right, according to our > > Bill > > > > of Rights. Am I right? > > > > > -Lance > > > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Joel Brauer <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > >> If this is war they should be handled according to the Geneva > > > >> Conventions. If it's not war, then they should be handled the way any > > > >> non-us citizen is handled when captured by our authorities. WITH DUE > > > >> PROCESS! > > > > >> Joel Brauer > > > > >> Only you can decide to be happy! The rest of life is in the > > details... > > > > >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Lance McCulley < > > [email protected]>wrote: > > > > >>> What court system should be used, if any? > > > > >>> -Lance > > > > >>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Jarrad Reiner <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > >>>> Couldn't agree more... > > > > >>>> Jarrad > > > > >>>> On Feb 24, 2009, at 3:12 PM, clowkun wrote: > > > > >>>> > I'm sorry but if they're not American citizens they don't have the > > > >>>> > right to use our court system to challenge their detention. I > > don't > > > >>>> > want them to be put in unsanitary and humiliating conditions such > > as > > > >>>> > Guantanamo Bay but they can not use our court system to challenge > > > >>>> > their detention. > > > > >>>> > On Feb 24, 7:20 am, Jarrad Reiner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>>> >>http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ > > > >>>> >> ALeqM5inrssFARYO4US7mMu27... > > > > >>>> >> Jarrad --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Politically Opinionated Outspoken People Expounding Religion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pooper?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
