You are seriously, no longer worth my time or effort. Good bye and good luck on your aspirations.
-Lance On Apr 21, 2009 12:37 PM, "Jarrad Reiner" <[email protected]> wrote: Republicans see them as separate issues because "national defense" is provided for by the Constitution, whereas the Fed's socialist-leaning economic programs of late ARE NOT. They are most different as determined by their constitutionality. You most certainly called me an undeserving name because, as you put it, I was making "blanket statements" as you ASSUMED I was identifying liberals at the Tea Party by how they looked, acted, or talked. When I did nothing of the sort. Your Assumption lead you to a wrong Conclusion which led you to mislabel me. The entire paragraph in question: >> This was pretty humorous--"talked with independents, liberals and libertarians all in attendanc... Now, once I pointed out your mistake, you switched your argument to: Jarrad was making blanket statements about Obama's socialist views being wacko. Yet, that had nothing to do with your original "blanket statements" point found in the above quoted paragraph. You switched points in order to save face. Nice try. You ask where were the Republican politicians were when Bush was growing the government in the earlier years? They didn't oppose it because by and large they considered it a part of National defense during wartime and they (and their constituency) thought it to be Constitutionally sound. And do not forget that early on, many of those votes were received from the democrat side of the isle as well. I doubt the Republican attitudes have changed much, I suspect they still support his "national defense" growth of government. Yet a Large numbers of those very same Republican legislators HAVE Consistently Opposed Bush as he adopted socialist-style economic policies. * They're behavior hasn't changed, the type of spending and Government control Bush was pushing is what changed. * Let me spell it out; A large number of Republican legislators supported Bush's expansion of the government when it was for National Defense during wartime because they believed it was Constitutionally Sound. A large number of those same legislators have opposed Bush during his Expansion of Government control and dominance in the Private Sector and the Free Market because they believe that Action to be Unconstitutional. Jarrad On Apr 21, 2009, at 12:54 PM, Lance McCulley wrote: > That's the problem, Jarrad. Republic... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Politically Opinionated Outspoken People Expounding Religion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pooper?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
