What no Apology? :)
Jarrad On Apr 21, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Lance McCulley wrote: > You are seriously, no longer worth my time or effort. Good bye and > good luck on your aspirations. > > -Lance > > On Apr 21, 2009 12:37 PM, "Jarrad Reiner" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Republicans see them as separate issues because "national defense" > is provided for by the Constitution, whereas the Fed's socialist- > leaning economic programs of late ARE NOT. They are most different > as determined by their constitutionality. > > You most certainly called me an undeserving name because, as you put > it, I was making "blanket statements" as you ASSUMED I was > identifying liberals at the Tea Party by how they looked, acted, or > talked. When I did nothing of the sort. Your Assumption lead you > to a wrong Conclusion which led you to mislabel me. > The entire paragraph in question: > >> This was pretty humorous--"talked with independents, liberals and > libertarians all in attendanc... > > Now, once I pointed out your mistake, you switched your argument > to: Jarrad was making blanket statements about Obama's socialist > views being wacko. Yet, that had nothing to do with your original > "blanket statements" point found in the above quoted paragraph. You > switched points in order to save face. Nice try. > > You ask where were the Republican politicians were when Bush was > growing the government in the earlier years? They didn't oppose it > because by and large they considered it a part of National defense > during wartime and they (and their constituency) thought it to be > Constitutionally sound. And do not forget that early on, many of > those votes were received from the democrat side of the isle as > well. I doubt the Republican attitudes have changed much, I suspect > they still support his "national defense" growth of government. Yet > a Large numbers of those very same Republican legislators HAVE > Consistently Opposed Bush as he adopted socialist-style economic > policies. They're behavior hasn't changed, the type of spending > and Government control Bush was pushing is what changed. > > Let me spell it out; A large number of Republican legislators > supported Bush's expansion of the government when it was for > National Defense during wartime because they believed it was > Constitutionally Sound. A large number of those same legislators > have opposed Bush during his Expansion of Government control and > dominance in the Private Sector and the Free Market because they > believe that Action to be Unconstitutional. > > > Jarrad > On Apr 21, 2009, at 12:54 PM, Lance McCulley wrote: > That's the > problem, Jarrad. Republic... > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Politically Opinionated Outspoken People Expounding Religion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pooper?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
