Hi David, On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 11:25:51AM +1000, David Holmes wrote: > > Will it be best to create a JBS issue for each change, or one issue for > > the entire effort? > > Can you create a PR against mainline so that we can see the scope of the > changes and how they have been implemented?
Sure, I'll do that. It will take me some time, but I agree it's a good starting point. > Knowing the technical scope would also aid evaluation of whether this needs > to be treated as a full porting project, or whether it can just be > accommodated the way we, for example, accommodate the MUSL libc used on > Alpine Linux. That's actually an interesting perspective. As the current port is using a lot of code from the Linux version (sadly by duplication atm,) but also piggybacks on the MacOS port. Looking forward to see your thoughts on this when I present the code in a PR. > Is this a re-vamp of the BSD-port project [1] or is this a > distinct effort? As I've understood it, the goal is to revitalize the BSD-port, and to keep this as an ongoing effort. Thanks, Harald
