I don't understand. This should not go to -stable.
Tom Smyth <[email protected]> wrote: > Stuart, all, > Sorry for missing this, and not replying sooner, > > > It might be worth doing a release for those running stable, and then > adding in the fix with an ifdef > Ill have a chat with Stefan, offline, > > On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 at 01:14, Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > quick heads-up, this change in base needs nsh to catch up. I didn't > > check but I assume the existing code is going to be similar enough to > > what's in usr.bin/netstat/mbuf.c that it should be easy to adapt. > > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Alexander Bluhm <[email protected]> ----- > > > > From: Alexander Bluhm <[email protected]> > > Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 05:34:40 -0600 (MDT) > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: src > > > > CVSROOT: /cvs > > Module name: src > > Changes by: [email protected] 2025/06/22 05:34:40 > > > > Modified files: > > sys/kern : kern_sysctl.c uipc_mbuf.c uipc_mbuf2.c > > sys/sys : mbuf.h > > usr.bin/netstat: mbuf.c > > > > Log message: > > Protect mbuf statistics counter with splnet. > > > > MP safe conters with per CPU memory still need spl protection when > > called from interrupt context. Some increments of mbuf counters > > had that, others did not. Introduce inline function mbstat_inc() > > and enum counter types for mbufs, like we have elsewhere. With > > that mbufs counter increment takes splnet() everywhere. > > > > OK mvs@ dlg@ > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > -- > Kindest regards, > Tom Smyth. >
