On 2018/07/25 13:45, Elias M. Mariani wrote:
> Yes, makes sense, In my mind "base component" was pytest, but I was
> thinking out of context.
> Changed to 5,
> Quirks rev. 0

Oh, braindead me (I blame the temperature), quirks should just bump
the version not REVISION, I can fix that.

shadchin@, is removal OK with you?


> 
> 
> 2018-07-25 13:03 GMT-03:00 Stuart Henderson <[email protected]>:
> > On 2018/07/25 12:51, Elias M. Mariani wrote:
> >> I think that I got it right this time...
> >> Sorry.
> >>
> >> Cheers.
> >> Elias.
> >>
> >> 2018-07-25 12:45 GMT-03:00 Elias M. Mariani <[email protected]>:
> >> > Dont bother replying, I made a stupid mistake.
> >> > Braindead v2.0
> >> >
> >> > 2018-07-25 12:44 GMT-03:00 Elias M. Mariani <[email protected]>:
> >> >> Thanks Stuart, is this ok ?
> >> >> Mostly the quirks part, I have never touched it until now.
> >> >>
> >> >> 2018-07-25 12:13 GMT-03:00 Stuart Henderson <[email protected]>:
> >> >>> On 2018/07/25 12:10, Elias M. Mariani wrote:
> >> >>>> We are currently using pytest 3.5.0.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Acording to pytest changelog:
> >> >>>> "Pytest now captures and displays output from the standard logging
> >> >>>> module. The user can control the logging level to be captured by
> >> >>>> specifying options in pytest.ini, the command line and also during
> >> >>>> individual tests using markers. Also, a caplog fixture is available
> >> >>>> that enables users to test the captured log during specific tests
> >> >>>> (similar to capsys for example). For more information, please see the
> >> >>>> logging docs. This feature was introduced by merging the popular
> >> >>>> pytest-catchlog plugin, thanks to Thomas Hisch. Be advised that during
> >> >>>> the merging the backward compatibility interface with the defunct
> >> >>>> pytest-capturelog has been dropped."
> >> >>>> https://docs.pytest.org/en/latest/changelog.html#pytest-3-3-0-2017-11-23
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> "The pytest-capturelog plugin is now also blacklisted, avoiding errors
> >> >>>> when running pytest with it still installed."
> >> >>>> https://docs.pytest.org/en/latest/changelog.html#pytest-3-3-1-2017-12-05
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> So the plugin is not active even when devel/py-test-capturelog is
> >> >>>> installed since version 3.3.1.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Meaning: This is a useless plugin. Is not being used because it can't 
> >> >>>> be used.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Just to be 200% sure I tested the results with and without
> >> >>>> py-test-capturelog (even when this shouldn't affect tests even if it
> >> >>>> would be working, but to ease any doubts...).
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> sqlite3 /usr/local/share/sqlports "select FULLPKGPATH from depends
> >> >>>> where dependspath like '%devel/py-test-capturelog%';"
> >> >>>> productivity/khal
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Test with capturelog:
> >> >>>> 43 failed, 231 passed, 1 xfailed, 1 warnings
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Test without capturelog:
> >> >>>> 43 failed, 231 passed, 1 xfailed
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> The warning being:
> >> >>>> "pytest-capturelog plugin has been merged into the core, please remove
> >> >>>> it from your requirements."
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Find attached a diff containing the modified
> >> >>>> productivity/khal/Makefile removing the test dependency on
> >> >>>> devel/py-test-capturelog and the removal o devel/py-test-capturelog
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Cheers.
> >> >>>> Elias.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Needs an entry in devel/quirks for the removal.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> No need to bump REVISION in productivity/khal, it doesn't affect the
> >> >>> package.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Otherwise OK with me
> >> >>>
> >
> >
> > my @msg = (
> >         "ancient software that doesn't work", #0
> >         "web application with no benefit being packaged", #1
> >         "no longer maintained and full of security holes", #2
> >         "no longer maintained upstream", #3
> >         "superseded by base component", #4
> >         "outdated and/or no longer required by other ports", #5
> >         "no longer useful", #6
> >         "removed in favor of using languages package manager", #7
> >         "requires systemd", #8
> >         "256 colors only, suggest scrot or xwd", #9
> >
> >
> > Reason #4 is for things which have been replaced with something in the base 
> > OS.
> > 5 is probably the best choice I think? quirks *does* need a REVISION bump.
> >
> >


Reply via email to