It's already committed.
On 2018/08/10 15:19, Charlène wrote: > On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 20:34:36 +0200 > Jan Klemkow wrote: > > > Hi Rafael, > > > > On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 06:31:53PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > > On Thu Aug 02, 2018 at 05:36:13PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote: > > > > Hi Rafael, > > > > > > > > I also worked on an cmark port. I took your tar ball and fixed > > > > all comments Stuart pointed out. Just, the MAINTAINER field is > > > > still unset, But, a portscheck run does not require this field. > > > > > > > > I replaced the manual DISTFILE and MASTER_SITE handling by the > > > > GH_* variables, moved it to category "textproc" and correct some > > > > spacing. > > > > > > That wasn't the way to go and the spacing was fine -- trust me or > > > use vim. Please see my traball. > > > > You are right, I missed some spaces. But, I already used vim ;-) > > > > > > > > > > Hopefully that helps you. I also need this tool for a private > > > > project of mine. > > > > > > Would you like to take MAINTAINER? > > > > Yes, I can do that. See my attached tar ball. I removed a useless > > line and replaced some spaces by tabs. And it uses the GH_* > > variables. > > > > Hope that's fine for all so far. > > > > Thanks, > > Jan > > Hi! > > I'd be happy to see cmark added to ports too. > > The build and runtime works fine on i386, i tested old personal > projects that used it and John Gruber's test suite [1] without any > issue. > > Charlène. > > [1] http://daringfireball.net/projects/downloads/MarkdownTest_1.0.zip > >
