Hello! On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 09:42:55AM +0300, Andrey N. Oktyabrski wrote: >Andreas Vögele wrote: >>>>I've attached a port of Exim 4.60, which includes the setting
>>>Please provide a unified diff against -current. >>-FLAVORS=no_exiscan no_x11 mysql postgresql ldap iconv >>+FLAVORS=no_exiscan no_x11 mysql postgresql sqlite3 ldap iconv sasl >Have You any plans for spf flavor? I have the port for libspf2-1.0.4 and >exim-4.50 port with this flavor. >.if ${FLAVOR:L:Mspf} >EXIM_MAKECAT+= "EXPERIMENTAL_SPF=yes\n" >EXIM_EXTRA_LIBS+= -L${LOCALBASE}/lib -lspf2 >EXIM_LDFLAGS+= -L${LOCALBASE}/lib -lspf2 >EXIM_CFLAGS+= -DSPF -I${LOCALBASE}/include >LIB_DEPENDS+= spf2.1:libspf2-*:mail/libspf2 >.endif If you're doing libspf2, you could perhaps have use of this patch. Fixed a crash with some SPF records for us. Kind regards, Hannah. Index: src/libspf2/spf_compile.c =================================================================== --- src/libspf2/spf_compile.c (revision 24561) +++ src/libspf2/spf_compile.c (revision 24562) @@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ * expand the buffer */ - len = sizeof( struct in_addr ); + len = sizeof( struct in6_addr ); if ( spfi->mech_buf_len - spfi->header.mech_len < len ) { SPF_mech_t *new_first;