On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 06:15:25PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > >On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 11:03:01PM -0300, Andr?s Delfino wrote: > > > >| >And what/who needs this? > > I do. Not because I want to write non-portable sed, but because I > often come across scripts I want to use that use GNU sed features.
Ok, now we're getting somewhere... > I really don't see the point of your argument. > There is a port and there is a maintainer for it. > Where's your problem? The problem as I see it is determining if this will be useful, *used*, and *actively* maintained, vs. ported once and forgotten about. If it's the former, then great! If it's the latter, then it stinks. -- Darrin Chandler | Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://phxbug.org/ | http://metabug.org/ http://www.stilyagin.com/ | Daemons in the Desert | Global BUG Federation
