On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 06:35:24PM +0200, Nikolay Sturm wrote:
| * Paul de Weerd [2007-05-15]:
| > The problem is in the 'we should have everything + the kitchen sink in
| > the portstree'-attitude. Ports/packages should add functionality. In
| > the past, software has been removed from the portstree because the
| > functionality provided by them had been added to the base OS. There's
| > no need to add ports that have no additional value other than "hey,
| > that's one more package we've ported to OpenBSD".
|
| This is your opinion, the ports tree works differently.
Yes, i'm sorry i didn't make that more clear. This is how i've seen
stuff being handled so far. I'm not a developer so take what i say
with a sufficiently large dose of skepticism. The actual process is
not known to me ;)
Cheers,
Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd
--
>++++++++[<++++++++++>-]<+++++++.>+++[<------>-]<.>+++[<+
+++++++++++>-]<.>++[<------------>-]<+.--------------.[-]
http://www.weirdnet.nl/
