Hello,

On 2023/06/29 15:42:00 +0200, Sebastien Marie <sema...@online.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> With latest changes on ecl, we are able to update sbcl to latest version 
> (2.3.6).
> 
> As maintainer systematically timeout since several years now, I am taking 
> over 
> the maintainership (and no reply on private mail asking about continuing or 
> not 
> to maintain lang/sbcl).
> 
> I have mostly rewritten the port to ease testing building it with several 
> bootstraps (ecl, clisp, sbcl) on one architecture, and drop some historical 
> parts.
> 
> Regarding the way to build sbcl, it defaults to using lang/ecl (which is 
> portable as written in C), and use clisp for some archs only (amd64 and 
> powerpc, 
> as currently) as it is more fast.
> 
> 
> The mail includes:
> - a proper tarball (as for a new port)
> - a diff (for braves diff readers)
> 
> I tested:
> - on amd64, building with clisp (default), ecl and sbcl (2.2.5p0 and 2.3.6)
> - on aarch64, building with ecl, and sbcl (2.3.6)
> - all dependencies are still building on amd64

I've only tested on amd64 with clisp, but runtime tested a few things,
including stumpwm.

> The port is buildable on wider architectures range.
> 
> Comments or OK ?

ok op@

Thanks for updating sbcl! :)

Reply via email to