Hi, On Fri, Oct 9, 2026 at 1:51 PM Kurt Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Oct 8, 2026, at 3:32 PM, Sebastian Reitenbach < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Kurt, > > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2026 at 2:04 AM Kurt Miller <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I’m starting to look this over. Thanks for working on it. > > A few initial suggestions. > > > > I think CATEGORY = graphics makes sense as the primary category > > for this. The reason we try to avoid putting ports in the java > > category as primary is essentially we don’t do it for any other > > language - e.g. we don’t have python, rust, or go categories > > and put all python, rust or go programs in there. > > > > DESCR could be better. I yanked this from the javafx reference > > manual - feel free to use that or adjust it: > > > > JavaFX is a set of graphics and media packages that enables > > developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich > > client applications that operate consistently across diverse > > platforms. > > > > I agree with the no ‘+’ on MODJAVA_VER and think your idea to > > accommodate multiple versions is good. Perhaps > > graphics/openjfx21 makes sense instead of another directory > > layer. Along the same lines in order to avoid conflicts with > > other OpenJFX versions, installing the jars into > > $MODJAVA_JAR_DIR/openjfx21/ would work nicely. > > > > I'll move it to graphics/openjfx/21 with the hope, there might be a > Makefile.inc > > I could place into graphics/openjfx, and there will be enough shared > items.... > > Ah good idea. > > find attached the updated openjfx, now moved to graphics/openjfx/21 Including updated DESCR as proposed above. hope that's kind of final, and can go in. working on cleaning up autopsy itself, to hopfully send it soon as well. cheers, Sebastian -- https://buzzdeee.reitenba.ch
openjfx.tar.gz
Description: application/gzip
