Lucas de Sena writes: > > 2 only makes sense if prboom-plus provides something the other Doom > > ports don't. Does it? If not, my inclination is to delete prboom-plus, > > delete prboom (unless it too provides something unique), keep dsda-doom, > > and maybe port prboomx. > > > > No, DSDA-Doom features everything prboom did before the repository > getting archived. And even included support for [UMAPINFO] by default, > which, on prboom+, was kept on a separate branch until v2.5.1.5, which > our ported version predates.
Barring objection, ok bentley@ to remove prboom and prboom-plus.
