On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 02:22:47PM +0100, Hannah Schroeter wrote: > Hi! > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 12:41:29PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > >On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Hannah Schroeter wrote: > >>Seems people reported problems with kqemu, so I'm not in favor of > >>dropping the non-kqemu variant. > > >The point is that qemu should work fine with or without kqemu with no > >need of a FLAVOR. > >Even if compiled with support for kqemu, qemu will proceed in software > >mode is the kernel module is not loaded. > > >If this works fine like that, then the non-kqemu variant should be > >dropped. > > Can one, then, also disable kqemu in the kqemu variant of qemu even when > the kqemu kernel module is loaded, e.g. with a command line option? >
Yes. Quoting http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/kqemu-doc.html : When QEMU is compiled with KQEMU support, the following option is added to QEMU: `-no-kqemu' Disable the usage of the QEMU Accelerator module (KQEMU). QEMU will work as usual but will be slower. This option can be useful to determine if emulation problems are coming from KQEMU. -- stefan http://stsp.name PGP Key: 0xF59D25F0
pgpEqLq2pPX5k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
