On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 09:27:56PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > Shouldn't the updated ports be changed to work with either lib? We > can do that, right? And a conflict added so that glut and freeglut > can't be installed together before pkg_add complains about collisions? > >
Hmm, that would mean: ports: Depend on A or B, take whatever is installed. That would also imply that the api must be the same, which i'm not 100% sure. Some ports might prefer freeglut (because it has better fullscreen support appearantly). packages: Can depend on A or B, but in case A is not available in $PKG_PATH, install B. Conflict markers... easy. Is glut worth that? And is the ports tree/pkg_add that flexible? Marc?
