On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 04:06:59PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2008/11/11 10:55, Ted Unangst wrote: > > I wouldn't terribly mind if glut were removed, although when I think > > of glut I think of glut, not freeglut. > > > > My concerns primarily center around having an upgrade path. I already > > have glut installed. Anybody who thinks "I need glut" is going to go > > into the port and build it themselves. What do we do? > > > > Maybe the glut port can just be changed to use freeglut, then it's > > transparent. > > > > I think that would be much simpler. >
Okay, with the options sorted and a few opinions heard, who's going to take a look at it and decide something? ;) I'd be happy to rework the diff if needed.
