On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:42 PM, David Taveras<d3taveras3...@gmail.com> wrote: > I just thought that a OBSD user shoudl always go after stable, because > stable is "stable" .. and thus more supported then release...
Just speaking for myself, I've had very good experience using -current. I don't follow it via CVS nor try to keep up. I just rebuild every 3 to 6 months (sometimes up to a year) using the latest -current along with the latest ports tree available at that time. I've had good results doing this on several different archs (i386, amd64 and sparc64). I also purchase -release every year or so to support the project. I like -current. Back when I used -release and followed -stable, I cannot say that -stable was any more "stable" than -current has been... at least in my experience. Of course, if you're following -current religiously, then that is another matter. Brad