Hi, On Sat, 05.09.2009 at 13:57:00 -0700, Ryan Boggs <rmbo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Has anyone else tested the attached diff yet? If so, are there any changes > that need to > be made before it can be committed? Please let me know so I can make the > necessary > adjustments.
I'm just looking into it, after creating a simple-minded update myself, because I didn't look into this list first. The MESSAGE file has a reference to Django 1.0, which is not suitable for Django 1.1. Slightly off-topic, but we should make an effort to get Django 1.1 into ports RSN, as both Django apps tend to depend on 1.1, and 1.0.2 has a known security hole. It should imho have been in 4.6, but I can blame myself for not spotting the problem and investing work myself in time, too. Kind regards, --Toni++
