On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:08:46 +0200 Anil Madhavapeddy <a...@recoil.org> wrote:
> On 26 Mar 2010, at 02:43, Stuart Henderson wrote: > >> > >> There is a lablgtk2 available based on gtk+2, but if the existing > >> port isn't being used, is it worth the time to port the new one? > >> > >> http://wwwfun.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/soft/olabl/lablgtk.html > >> > > > > it's in /usr/ports/x11/lablgtk2; both are currently used (lablgtk > > only for graphics/camlimages). > > > > I'm fine with removing lablgtk, but camlimages will need an update to > the version here: http://cristal.inria.fr/camlimages/ > > I'm travelling till end of next week, so if anyone else can knock up > a update, I'll try it out (worth putting it in the tree soon, the > current port is terribly old and buggy). > > Although the only reason it depends on lablgtk at all is a simple > image viewer example which I'm sure noone actually uses... > > -anil I'll try to port the new camlimages this weekend so jasper can zap the lablgtk port. I'm very unfamiliar with caml, so I'll probably need help with testing. jcr
