On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 02:09:02AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:03:23AM +0000, Jacob Meuser wrote: > > is there still a use for xmame or has it truly been superceeded > > by sdlmame/sdlmess? > > As i already told you privately, xmame is dead upstream and its devs > consider sdl* the endorsed replacement. So if anyone is really attached > to xmame and doesn't want to switch to sdlmame, provide a valid reason, > or be prepared to see xmame die with extreme prejudice. > > Landry
Yes, xmame is completely dead, sdlmame should be used instead. Actually, sdlmame has been integrated in upstream MAME, it's not a separate release anymore. So, would it make sense to rename the sdlmame/sdlmess ports to mame/mess, or is it too much pain for no real gain? Pierre
