On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 04:58:50PM +0200, Pierre Riteau wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 02:09:02AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:03:23AM +0000, Jacob Meuser wrote: > > > is there still a use for xmame or has it truly been superceeded > > > by sdlmame/sdlmess? > > > > As i already told you privately, xmame is dead upstream and its devs > > consider sdl* the endorsed replacement. So if anyone is really attached > > to xmame and doesn't want to switch to sdlmame, provide a valid reason, > > or be prepared to see xmame die with extreme prejudice. > > > > Landry > > Yes, xmame is completely dead, sdlmame should be used instead. > > Actually, sdlmame has been integrated in upstream MAME, it's not a > separate release anymore. So, would it make sense to rename the > sdlmame/sdlmess ports to mame/mess, or is it too much pain for no real > gain?
I guess that depends on how confusing it would be to users? I mean, if a user is looking for mame, would they know to look for sdlmame? -- jake...@sdf.lonestar.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
