On 5 April 2011 11:03, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote: > On 2011/04/05 09:39, Puffy BSD wrote: >> I know about that, just looking for an answer. > > The answer is: if you want to run -current ports, run -current > or do the work yourself. > >> I've gotten Firefox 3.6.16 and Chromium 10.0.648.204 to work on 4.8 so >> I figured this wouldn't be impossible either. > > Anyone else reading tempted to do the same but on amd64 should note > that Chromium will need compiler changes. > > Chromium needed a modified compiler to build on i386 as well.
- Re: Firefox 4.0 on 4.8-stable Puffy BSD
- Re: Firefox 4.0 on 4.8-stable Landry Breuil
- Re: Firefox 4.0 on 4.8-stable Puffy BSD
- Re: Firefox 4.0 on 4.8-stable Mikolaj Kucharski
- Re: Firefox 4.0 on 4.8-stable Puffy BSD
- Re: Firefox 4.0 on 4.8-sta... Puffy BSD
- Re: Firefox 4.0 on 4.8-sta... Puffy BSD
- Re: Firefox 4.0 on 4.8-sta... Puffy BSD
- Re: Firefox 4.0 on 4.8-sta... Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
- Re: Firefox 4.0 on 4.8-stable Stuart Henderson
- Re: Firefox 4.0 on 4.8-stable Puffy BSD
- Re: Firefox 4.0 on 4.8-stable Stuart Henderson
- Re: Firefox 4.0 on 4.8-stable Puffy BSD
- Re: Firefox 4.0 on 4.8-sta... patrick keshishian
- Re: Firefox 4.0 on 4.8-sta... Stuart Henderson
- Re: Firefox 4.0 on 4.8-sta... Puffy BSD
- Re: Firefox 4.0 on 4.8-sta... Peter Hessler
- Re: Firefox 4.0 on 4.8-sta... Mikolaj Kucharski
- Re: Firefox 4.0 on 4.8-sta... Puffy BSD
- Re: Firefox 4.0 on 4.8-sta... Stuart Henderson
- Re: Firefox 4.0 on 4.8-sta... Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse