On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 18:11:17 +0200 Benoit Lecocq <b...@arcane-labs.net> wrote: > On 04/10/11 17:18, Remi Pointel wrote: > > On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 21:35:21 +0800 > > wen heping<wenhep...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi: > >> > >> Here is a new port devel/py-pip. > >> > >> pip is a replacement for easy_install. It uses mostly the > >> same techniques for finding packages, so packages that were > >> made easy_installable should be pip-installable as well. > >> > >> Tested OK on Loongson. > >> > >> Comments ? > > Hello, > > > > COMMENT is not ok, read here : http://www.openbsd.org/faq/ports/guide.html. > > I have replaced "An" by "Python". > > > > Also, port uses egginfo, so you must use MODPY_EGG_VERSION. > > > > I have added spaces around variables. > > > > This is the tarball with the modifications. > > > > I'm asking if we must install bin/pip, or just bin/pip-${MODPY_VERSION}, > > and write a pkg/MESSAGE to make a symbolic link (like bin/python2.x). Any > > opinion on it ? > > > > Otherwise, seems to work fine (amd64). > > > > Cheers, > > > > Remi. > > Works fine for me too. > > I prefer a symbolic link for pip.
I agree. This is a new tarball with pkg/MESSAGE, pkg/UNMESSAGE, and comment in PLIST bin/pip. Are you ok ? Cheers, Remi.
py-pip-1.0.tar.gz
Description: Binary data
