On 2011-07-04, Amit Kulkarni <amitk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The port/package will get upgraded, so I don't think it should be a > problem there as there is a version bump, and the files would get > removed during upgrade. But I think in general, if for some reason > there is two librpm.so.0.1 and librpm.so.0.2 (I don't exactly know > what the .so name, I am just guessing) in /usr/local/lib, then to > force the use of most recent .so, it is always better to increment. > Somebody will correct me if this explanation is wrong. > >
RTF porters faq.
