On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 07:29:31PM +0200, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
> > I was the one holding out for junit3 and 4 ports, but on thinking
> > about it, anybody that's truly dependant on 3.8 will likely have it
> > and the other jars that depend on 3.8 cached in their project source/lib
> > directory anyway, so maybe it's OK to just have junit4.  At he least it
> > might encourage somebody to upgrade their test suite :-)
> In that case, would my diff be the way to move forward (and adjust
> jeoip/postgresql-jdbc where needed (build-wise))?

And here's the diff for jeoip:

Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/geo/jeoip/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -p -r1.16 Makefile
--- Makefile    5 Sep 2011 08:57:43 -0000       1.16
+++ Makefile    5 Sep 2011 20:06:58 -0000
@@ -24,13 +24,13 @@ MODJAVA_JRERUN=             Yes
 MODJAVA_BUILD=         ant
 MODJAVA_BUILD_TARGET=  jar docs
 
-BUILD_DEPENDS=         java/junit=3.8.2
+BUILD_DEPENDS=         java/junit
 REGRESS_DEPENDS=       net/GeoIP \
-                       java/junit=3.8.2
+                       java/junit
 RUN_DEPENDS=           net/GeoIP\
                        java/javaPathHelper
 MAKE_ENV=              JAVA_HOME=${JAVA_HOME} \
-                       
CLASSPATH=${LOCALBASE}/share/java/classes/junit-3.8.2/junit.jar
+                       
CLASSPATH=${LOCALBASE}/share/java/classes/junit/junit.jar
 
 WRKDIST=               ${WRKDIR}/jeoip
 

Reply via email to