Hi,

> ...and slightly more updated patch.  There are some more things that
> can happen to this port, namely staticlly linking, but I've found the
> configure script unhappy; instead of messing around with that now, I'd
> like to move forward and put this in, then work on the above, plus
> possibly subpackaging it (though I'm leaning towards not anymore) and
> maybe doing a split install.
>
> Previous MAINTAINER has been OK with moving forward for quite some time
> now :)
>
> Feedback, comments, OKs?

I'm running it in production without problems (amd64), so I'm ok, but I'm
not a developer. It would be great if this could get committed.

Kind regards,


Martijn Rijkeboer

Reply via email to