On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:18:19PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: > On May 07 11:36:30, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 11:24:36AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: > > > On May 07 09:44:36, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > > surprised we didn't have this already. it does more than just adjust > > > > line-endings so I think it is actually useful. ok? > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > Information for inst:dos2unix-6.0 > > > > > > > > Comment: > > > > convert DOS/MAC files to UNIX (line-endings/charset) > > > > > > > > Description: > > > > Convert text files with DOS or Mac line breaks to Unix line breaks and > > > > vice versa. Features: > > > > > > > > * Automatically skips binary and non-regular files. > > > > * In-place, paired, or stdio mode conversion. > > > > * Keep original file dates option. > > > > * 7-bit and iso conversion modes like SunOS dos2unix. > > > > * Conversion of Windows UTF-16 files to Unix UTF-8. > > > > > > > > Maintainer: The OpenBSD ports mailing-list <ports@openbsd.org> > > > > > > > > WWW: http://waterlan.home.xs4all.nl/dos2unix.html > > > > > > > > > > I don't think this is right: > > > > > > post-install: > > > mv ${PREFIX}/share/man/* ${PREFIX}/man/ > > > rmdir ${PREFIX}/share/man > > > > > > The orig Makefile should be patched instead to have > > > > > > mandir = $(prefix)/man > > > man1dir = $(mandir)/man1 > > > > > > and install there. > > > > What is the benefit? Using sthen's method we can save a patch. > > We need to patch the orig Makefile anyway, > and this makes the port's Makefile simpler. > > > > Also, the mv line moves all man directories of all packages > > > that have installed there, which is none of its bussines. > > > > Huh? I think you are totally confused :) > > That's well possible. > > Let's say I have /usr/local/share/man/man1/prog.1 > (however it got there from some third-site, unported software). > > Now I make install dos2unix. The post-install portion > of Stuart's Makefile moves prog.1 which it has nothing > to do with. Is that correct?
No. > Oh. This happens in the fake prefix, right? Excuse moi. Yes. -- Antoine
