On 19 Sep 2012, at 01:52, David Coppa <dco...@openbsd.org> wrote: > -SHA1 (lablgtk-2.14.2.tar.gz) = /RhEGMy8VCgldIymP7p1E40upWE= > -SHA256 (lablgtk-2.14.2.tar.gz) = SYGr7avcRiMD80UQQELIivInzNUP0wqb9I/TU6sC0Lo= > -SIZE (lablgtk-2.14.2.tar.gz) = 779803 > +SHA256 (lablgtk-2.16.0.tar.gz) = oOqXUuslfa3PwpFECP/zOdTDQ1eALwLGMyndQbd33i8= > +SIZE (lablgtk-2.16.0.tar.gz) = 787217 > Index: patches/patch-META > =================================================================== > RCS file: patches/patch-META > diff -N patches/patch-META > --- patches/patch-META 22 May 2012 13:56:33 -0000 1.3 > +++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 > @@ -1,23 +0,0 @@ > -$OpenBSD: patch-META,v 1.3 2012/05/22 13:56:33 dcoppa Exp $ > ---- META.orig Fri Feb 13 03:39:14 2009 > -+++ META Tue May 22 15:50:54 2012 > -@@ -1,8 +1,13 @@ > - requires="" > --version="2.12.0" > --archive(byte)="lablgtk.cma" > --archive(byte,init)="lablgtk.cma gtkInit.cmo" > --archive(native)="lablgtk.cmxa" > --archive(native,init)="lablgtk.cmxa gtkInit.cmx" > --linkopts="" > -+version="2.14.0"
I'm happy except for this... is this an upstream bug in the META file? Shouldn't it be 2.16.0 ? -anil > - directory="+lablgtk2" > -+requires(lablGL)="lablGL" > -+archive(byte)="lablgtk.cma lablgnomecanvas.cma gtkInit.cmo"
