On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Anil Madhavapeddy <a...@recoil.org> wrote: > On 19 Sep 2012, at 01:52, David Coppa <dco...@openbsd.org> wrote: > >> -SHA1 (lablgtk-2.14.2.tar.gz) = /RhEGMy8VCgldIymP7p1E40upWE= >> -SHA256 (lablgtk-2.14.2.tar.gz) = >> SYGr7avcRiMD80UQQELIivInzNUP0wqb9I/TU6sC0Lo= >> -SIZE (lablgtk-2.14.2.tar.gz) = 779803 >> +SHA256 (lablgtk-2.16.0.tar.gz) = >> oOqXUuslfa3PwpFECP/zOdTDQ1eALwLGMyndQbd33i8= >> +SIZE (lablgtk-2.16.0.tar.gz) = 787217 >> Index: patches/patch-META >> =================================================================== >> RCS file: patches/patch-META >> diff -N patches/patch-META >> --- patches/patch-META 22 May 2012 13:56:33 -0000 1.3 >> +++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 >> @@ -1,23 +0,0 @@ >> -$OpenBSD: patch-META,v 1.3 2012/05/22 13:56:33 dcoppa Exp $ >> ---- META.orig Fri Feb 13 03:39:14 2009 >> -+++ META Tue May 22 15:50:54 2012 >> -@@ -1,8 +1,13 @@ >> - requires="" >> --version="2.12.0" >> --archive(byte)="lablgtk.cma" >> --archive(byte,init)="lablgtk.cma gtkInit.cmo" >> --archive(native)="lablgtk.cmxa" >> --archive(native,init)="lablgtk.cmxa gtkInit.cmx" >> --linkopts="" >> -+version="2.14.0" > > I'm happy except for this... is this an upstream bug in the META file? > Shouldn't it be 2.16.0 ?
This is the old META file. patches/patch-META is gone: --- patches/patch-META 22 May 2012 13:56:33 -0000 1.3 +++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
