Daniel Dickman <didick...@gmail.com> wrote: > What ports are you looking at specifically? I'm working to port pandas so we > might have some overlap. See here: > http://dickman.org/openbsd/patches/pandas/ >
numpy scipy matplotlib ipython For starters. I know people have been working on ipython but qt4 flavor is holding them back. I use those on daily basis. I use several other modules but these four are the highest priority. Cheers, Predrag > The main one I have left to do is matplotlib. If you'd want to test I'm happy > send patches over. > > On Dec 13, 2012, at 10:00 PM, Predrag Punosevac <punoseva...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I am soliciting opinions about the "safety" of py-pip package > > management system. I am using Python primarily for scientific > > computing/prototyping. Many of standard scientific python modules in our > > ports tree are a bit outdated (trying to update some of those ports is > > on my todo list as I am sure it is on todo list of many people but busy > > schedule is another story). > > > > Inspired by my recent experience with hs-cabal I decided to play with > > py-pip on one of 5.1 installations which I will update soon. > > Surprisingly or maybe not I was actually able to update most of my > > python modules with exception of scipy which fails with linker problem > > > > ld: cannot find -lpython2.7 > > > > How safe is really using py-pip as a Python package manager? Is it > > possible to reconfigure py-pip to behave like cabal which installs > > modules in my home directory rather than in /usr/local/bin? > > > > Best, > > Predrag > >
