On 2013/08/14 16:14, Vadim Zhukov wrote: > After reading more off-side, I tend to agree with that we could just > have PERMIT_PACKAGE_FTP=Yes but PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM=No. > > I'm not entirely sure if the "nonfree" FLAVOR should be dropped entirely, > but I do not feel myself confident enough to judge on this. :)
It's a huge extra chunk of build time to build opencv twice, and there's a risk of things getting in a mess if one version is installed when the other is built (maybe it's fine now, but it's another thing that needs testing for at each update.) If a flavour is not linked to the build, it will very likely get broken somewhere down the line. If somebody particularly needs a version without the patented code then they could help test/maintain that, but until that need is demonstrated, I think there should just be a single version. > I'll send new patch today then, without "nonfree" FLAVOR. Thanks.
