On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:49:30PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 01:54:23PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote: > > just wanted to clarify some more. > > > > I have to say that webapps are still more than welcome in the OpenBSD tree. > > > > They must pass a few criteria though: > [...] > > - they must be maintained, with someone willing to follow upstream, as > > there are lots and lots of security issues with most of them. > > Well, we currently don't provide packages for -stable. So people > running, say, wordpress, won't get a ready-to-use wordpress-3.6.1 > package. Telling them to rebuild it themselves would contradict our > "use packages" paradigm. > > Ciao, > Kili > > ps: sorry for bitching around wrt Wordpress, but that's something > used by some of our customers, and I'm pretty sure it's not appropriate > for a package.
Bullshit. that's an argument FOR stable packages, not AGAINST webapps.
