On 1 September 2014 04:12, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas <j...@wxcvbn.org> wrote:
> Those deps are optional and I don't think it makes sense to ask users to > install > support for all backends supported by duplicity (the list is long). > Ok with me. The backends are in and the same outcome is achieved, be it with a little manual intervention. This said, 0.6.24 works fine here for my use case (which only involves > sftp). If you agree about the above points, this leads to this diff, to > be committed when the python.port.mk issue is solved: For me, when REVISION is removed, I get when I 'make plist' [create a new plist] to do a diff against: lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/${FULLPKGNAME\-}-py${MODPY_VERSION}.egg-info/ lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/${FULLPKGNAME\-}-py${MODPY_VERSION}.egg-info/PKG-INFO lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/${FULLPKGNAME\-}-py${MODPY_VERSION}.egg-info/SOURCES.txt lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/${FULLPKGNAME\-}-py${MODPY_VERSION}.egg-info/dependency_links.txt lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/${FULLPKGNAME\-}-py${MODPY_VERSION}.egg-info/top_level.txt which means it breaks when 'make package'. To fix this, I leave the REVISION in and explicitly define the PKGNAME: REVISION = 1 PKGNAME = ${DISTNAME} Is it just me or is Jim's email address broken? Maintainer needs to be looked at in some way possibly. On 1 September 2014 05:48, Giovanni Bechis <giova...@paclan.it> wrote: > > ok for me, maybe a multi package that adds dropbox, and other dependencies > ? > I do not care, I use only file and ssh backends but maybe it could be > useful to someone else. A flavour sounds like a good idea and I'll work on that in spare time but don't let it hold this up. Thanks, Jason