On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 07:33:21AM +1000, Jason Tubnor wrote:
> On 1 September 2014 04:12, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas <j...@wxcvbn.org> wrote:
>
>
> > Those deps are optional and I don't think it makes sense to ask users to
> > install
> > support for all backends supported by duplicity (the list is long).
> >
>
> Ok with me. The backends are in and the same outcome is achieved, be it
> with a little manual intervention.
>
> This said, 0.6.24 works fine here for my use case (which only involves
> > sftp). If you agree about the above points, this leads to this diff, to
> > be committed when the python.port.mk issue is solved:
>
>
> For me, when REVISION is removed, I get when I 'make plist' [create a new
> plist] to do a diff against:
>
> lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/${FULLPKGNAME\-}-py${MODPY_VERSION}.egg-info/
> lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/${FULLPKGNAME\-}-py${MODPY_VERSION}.egg-info/PKG-INFO
> lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/${FULLPKGNAME\-}-py${MODPY_VERSION}.egg-info/SOURCES.txt
> lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/${FULLPKGNAME\-}-py${MODPY_VERSION}.egg-info/dependency_links.txt
> lib/python${MODPY_VERSION}/site-packages/${FULLPKGNAME\-}-py${MODPY_VERSION}.egg-info/top_level.txt
>
> which means it breaks when 'make package'. To fix this, I leave the
> REVISION in and explicitly define the PKGNAME:
>
> REVISION = 1
> PKGNAME = ${DISTNAME}
>
> Is it just me or is Jim's email address broken? Maintainer needs to be
> looked at in some way possibly.
>
> On 1 September 2014 05:48, Giovanni Bechis <giova...@paclan.it> wrote:
>
> >
> > ok for me, maybe a multi package that adds dropbox, and other dependencies
> > ?
> > I do not care, I use only file and ssh backends but maybe it could be
> > useful to someone else.
>
>
> A flavour sounds like a good idea and I'll work on that in spare time but
> don't let it hold this up.
I think a simple note in DESCR is enough.
No need for a FLAVOR nor imposing dependencies for all possible backends.
--
Antoine
