On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:04:16AM -0500, Daniel Dickman wrote: > a few thoughts. > > I'm not in love with changing CFLAGS if hostname is raccoon. i would make a > choice to either include no-format or not. > > I would not run the regress tests as part of the main build but would > disconnect it. this is how most ports work as far as I know. > > while my ulimit patch will let the regress tests work, I think a note might > be desirable in pkg-readme. otherwise someone with a low ulimit -n will have > to hunt for the same problem when they try to run. > > ok daniel@ if these changes are made.
Here is a port of 0.61b that removes the hostname check and the default regress run. Isn't the default fd limit 512 in login.conf now? How do other ports advise on limits? There used to be a variable to set for ports that required a large data size to build but didn't that get removed?
afl.tgz
Description: application/tar-gz
