On 2015/08/25 00:36, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > > While looking at some BROKEN ports I stumbled upon this. It is marked > as broken on 64 bits archs, pokes deep inside the network stack > internals and kvm. I don't think the ports tree should propose such > code from 1998 running as root, when dhclient from base provides a much, > much saner alternative. > > ok to remove it?
Yes, please do. (But not wide-dhcpv6).
