On 2015/08/27 18:17, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 06:06:44PM +0200, Patrik Lundin wrote: > > Hello, > > > > portroach currently thinks security/softhsm is outdated. The reason for > > this is that while the version in ports is 1.3.7, there is a development > > release using a 2.0.0 version number. > > > > The diff below should limit the version check to the 1.x.x versions. > > Well the problem here is that once uptream release a 2.X version as stable, > then portroach will never know. > I'd rather have false positive in this case, rather than missing updates.
I agree - I imagine that you could skipv:2.0.0 for now though.
