On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 05:35:54PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2015/08/27 18:17, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 06:06:44PM +0200, Patrik Lundin wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > portroach currently thinks security/softhsm is outdated. The reason for > > > this is that while the version in ports is 1.3.7, there is a development > > > release using a 2.0.0 version number. > > > > > > The diff below should limit the version check to the 1.x.x versions. > > > > Well the problem here is that once uptream release a 2.X version as stable, > > then portroach will never know. > > I'd rather have false positive in this case, rather than missing updates. > > I agree - I imagine that you could skipv:2.0.0 for now though. >
I am pretty sure the 2.0.0 version would be a different port (security/softhsm2). Looking at the example at https://wiki.opendnssec.org/display/SoftHSMDOCS/SoftHSM+Documentation+v2.0 it can be seen that a different command line utility is used (specifically mentioning "2" in the name): === softhsm2-util --init-token --slot 0 --label "My token 1" === -- Patrik Lundin
