On 2015/10/08 21:49, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: > Hi, > > This question is probably not only about wpa_supplicant, but I was > affected by that one port, so will write what I've noticed. > > I've upgraded to: > > OpenBSD 5.8-current (GENERIC.MP) #1440: Thu Oct 8 07:52:55 MDT 2015 > dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP > > and upgraded all ports to the latest snapshot (for example > wpa_supplicant-2.5, digital-signature signify:2015-10-06T16:46:04Z) > > After reboot I could not connect to wifi and to wired networks with > wpa_supplicant as it failed in both cases as follows: > > # wpa_supplicant -c /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf -D openbsd -i iwn0 > Successfully initialized wpa_supplicant > Failed to get link-level address for interface 'iwn0'. > > I've recompiled the package and pkg_add -Dinstalled it and it's all good > now. However, I've looked at security/wpa_supplicant ports directory and > pkg_info -f output for old and new package and I don't see any wantlib > bumps in binary package nor revision bumps in the port. > > Does that mean if someone installs wpa_supplicant today like me and > later new package snapshot arrives with fixed wpa_supplicant, it will > not get upgraded, right? > > Should wpa_supplicant (and maybe other networking ports) get rev bump? > > I'm not sure what changed recently in networking stack to affect this. > > -- > best regards > q# >
Oh bleh, there is an embedded if_data in if_msghdr. I'll track them down.
