samba port maintainer here, kasak <ka...@kasakoff.net> writes:
> Maybe I am doing something wrong ? > > I have tried to provision domain and got error that samba was compiled > without acl support. > > On some forums I found advice to use "--use-ntvfs" option when provisioning. > > But it appeared that samba-tool doesn't know about this option: > > $ doas samba-tool domain provision --use-ntvfs > Usage: samba-tool domain provision [options] > > samba-tool domain provision: error: no such option: --use-ntvfs > > I think this option was deprecated in new versions of samba, but i was > not able to find information about it. No idea what went wrong in the last updates. IIUC it's just a matter of fixing domain provisioning, which used to work fine. I'll take a look at this soon(tm). > So, is it really possible to use OpenBSD as a DC? Everything is possible, but our lack of ACLs and extended attributes make OpenBSD a poor choice for samba, even if upstream supports backends that don't suffer these limitations. From my POV, net/samba is here first for simple file sharing and client libraries support. -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
